Home > Articles

WHAT IS A MESSIANIC PROPHECY? Part I

Shmuel Silberman

 

Both Jews and missionaries profess belief in the Messiah of the Hebrew Bible. It is surprising, then, that the term “the Messiah” does not appear in Jewish Scripture. “The Messiah” is a post-Biblical term for a Biblical concept. From where do billions of people get such an idea? When we look at what the Messiah is actually called, and what is his setting and function, we will see that missionaries have it wrong.

The word messiah means “anointed.” Both kings and priests are anointed in the Hebrew Bible (I Samuel 10:1, Leviticus 4:3). Literally speaking, the Jewish people have had many messiahs. In the future too, Israel will have more than one messiah. The prophets speak of priests, not only a king, who will serve in the Messianic era (Ezekiel 48, Jeremiah 33).

However, Jews have historically used the term “the Messiah” to refer specifically to King Messiah son of David.

If the Messiah is never called “the Messiah” in Jewish Scripture, how does one determine which passages are about him? Since Jews and missionaries disagree on so many points, one would expect that each side would dispute the selections of the other. This is not the case. In fact, there is a striking asymmetry. Where Jews identify verses as speaking about the Messiah, missionaries agree. However, verses that missionaries identify as messianic, Jews often do not. Why is this so?

The simple reason is that the traditional Jewish messianism is solidly based in Scripture whereas missionary messianism is not. There is no reason to reject the Jewish messianic passages as messianic, so missionaries agree. There is very good reason to reject missionary citations as messianic, because they are not.

How does Judaism decide which verses are about the Messiah?

In almost all cases, Jewish Scripture refers to the Messiah as

(1) King, or synonym for king
(2) David, or descendent of David

Both of these terms sometimes refer to individuals other than the Messiah. Obviously there are other kings. Of course “David” may refer to the actual King David rather than the Messiah. Naturally there are descendants of David besides the Messiah.

Whether or not “King” or “David” refers to the Messiah depends on context.

To understand why the Messiah is called “David”, it is necessary to explain the status of the Davidic dynasty in the Bible. Genesis 49:10 reads, “The scepter shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from amonghis descendents until Shiloh comes.” Royalty properly belongs to the tribe of Judah. Without discussing the etymology of “Shiloh”, it is clear that Shiloh is the culmination of Judah’s kingship. In other words, Shiloh is the Messiah.

David is from the tribe of Judah. The royal seat belongs specifically to David and his paternal descendents (I Chronicles 17:11, Psalms 89:36-39). G-d promised that the throne belongs to David and his descendents forever (II Samuel 7, Jeremiah 33). This does not mean David’s throne will always be functional- during the Babylonian exile the Jews had no king at all- but David’s line always retains the right to the throne. When the Messiah son of David comes, the royalty of David will be fully and permanently established.

An additional specification is that David’s throne is inherited exclusively by Solomon and his descendents (I Chronicles 22:10).

Solomon’s bothers (David’s other sons) are not eligible (28:5-7).

There are rules for Messianic eligibility. He must (a) belong to the tribe of Judah (b) descend paternally from David and Solomon (c) be a reigning King.

Jesus fails every single criterion bar none. He does not belong to the tribe of Judah, is not descended paternally from David or Solomon, and was never a King.

Tribal affiliation is based solely on the father (Numbers 1, Ezra 2). Since Jesus is supposedly born of a virgin, he has no father; hence no tribal affiliation. He cannot be a paternal descendent from David. The genealogy in Luke, which missionaries claim is Jesus' "natural" genealogy, traces Joseph back to Nathan. Nathan is Solomon's brother, but he is not Solomon.

Jesus was never a reigning king of Judah. Although Jesus claimed that his kingdom was "not of this world", and Pilate is depicted as labeling Jesus as "king of the Jews" at the crucifixion, that is not kingship in the Biblical sense. In the Hebrew Bible Jewish kings are anointed by prophets, are accepted as kings by their subjects, and rule politically. It is circular reasoning to reinvent a definition of king and then claim Jesus fits the bill.

The Messiah defined by Ezekiel 37

37:21 And say unto them, Thus says the L-rd G-d; Behold, I will take the children of Israel from the nations, where they have gone, and will gather them all around, and bring them to their own land: 37:22 AndI will make them one nation in the land upon the mountains of Israel;and one king shall be to them all: and they shall be no more two nations, neither shall they be divided into two kingdoms any more: 37:23 Neither shall they defile themselves any more with their idols, norwith their detestable things and their transgressions: butI will save them in all their dwelling places, where they have sinned, and will cleanse them: so shall they be My people, and I will betheir G-d. 37:24 And David my servant shall be king over them; and they all shall have one shepherd: they shall also follow My judgments, and observe My statutes, and do them. 37:25 And they shall dwell in the land that I have given to Jacob my servant, where their fathers have lived; and they shall live there forever, they, and their children, and their children’s children forever: and My servant David shall be their prince forever. 37:26 Moreover I will make a covenant of peace with them; it shall be an everlasting covenant with them: and I will establish them, and multiply them, and will set My Sanctuary in the midst of them forever. 37:27 My Tabernacle also shall be with them: I will be their G-d, and they shall be My people. 37:28 And the nations shall know that I the L-rd do sanctify Israel, when My sanctuary shallbe in their midst forever.

Jews and missionaries accept, and Scripture clarifies (Jeremiah 33, Isaiah 11) that “David” does not mean David himself but his descendent.

From this passage, we get a definitive view of the Messiah:
A Davidic king will reign in a world of (a) universal peace (b) universal knowledge of G-d (c) the Temple rebuilt (d) the Jewish exiles gathered to the land of Israel.

Missionaries do not dispute this. They differ from Jews in maintaining that Jesus is positively the one who will do so in the future. This prompts the question how missionaries can possibly grant the Messianic title to one who has not accomplished what he is required to do.

Messiah called David or King

Jeremiah 33:15 In those days, and at that time, will I cause a righteous branch to sprout for David; and he shall do justice and righteousness in the land.33:16 In those days, at that time, shall Judah be saved, and Jerusalem shall dwell securely: and she will be called, The L-rd Our Righteousness. 33:17 For so says the L-rd; there shall not be cut off for David a man to sit upon the throne over the house of Israel; 33:18 There shall not be cut off for the priests, the Levites a man before Me to offer burnt offerings, and tokindle meal offerings, and to do sacrifice continually. …33:25 So says the L-rd; If my covenant is not with day and night, and if I have not established the ordinances of heaven and earth; 33:26 Only then will I reject the children of Jacob, and David My servant, so that I will not take of his seed to be rulers over the seed of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob: for I will cause their captivity to return, and have mercy on them.

Jeremiah 33 is clear that a descendent of David will reign with the Temple service re-established and the Jews ingathered. The security of Jerusalem and saving of Judah suggest a situation of peace.

Isaiah
11:1 And there shall come forth a shoot out of the stem of Jesse, and a branch shall grow out of his roots: 11:2 And the spirit of the L-rd shall rest upon him, a spirit of wisdom and understanding, a spirit of counsel and might, a spirit of knowledge and fear of the L-rd; 11:3 He shall be filled with fear of the L-rd: and he shall not judge after the sight of his eyes, or rebuke based on the hearing of his ears: 11:4 But with righteousness shall he judge the poor, and rebuke with equity for the humble of the earth: and he shall smite the earth with the rod of his mouth, and with the breath of his lips shall he slay the wicked. 11:5 And righteousness shall be the girdle of his loins, and faithfulness the girdle of his waste. 11:6 The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the goat; and the calf and the young lion and the fattened ox together; and a young boy shall lead them. 11:7 And the cow and the bear shall graze together; their young ones shall lie down together: and the lion shall eat straw like the ox. 11:8 And the baby shall play on the hole of the viper, and the infant shall put his hand on an adder’s den. 11:9 They shall not hurt nor destroy in all My holy mountain: for the earth shall be full of the knowledge of the L-rd, as the waters cover the sea. 11:10 And in that day there shall be a root of Jesse, standing for an banner for the nations; it will be sought out, and his rest shall be glorious. 11:11 On that day the L-rd shall show His might again to redeem the remnant of his people, which shall be left, from Assyria, Egypt, Pathros, Cush, Elam, Shinar, and Hamath, and from the islands of the sea. 11:12 And he shall set up a signal for thenations, and shall assemble the exiles of Israel, and gather together the dispersed of Judah from the four corners of the earth.

Jesse is David’s father. Isaiah 11 speaks of a descendent of Jesse/David as political leader during the ingathering of the Jewish exiles. Wolf dwelling with lamb suggests a world at peace. Universal knowledge of G-d is predicted.

Hosea
3:4 For the children of Israel shall remain many days without king or prince, without sacrifice or sacred pillars, without ephod, or teraphim: 3:5 Afterward shall the children of Israel return, and seek the L-rd their G-d, and David their king; and shall fear the L-rd and His goodness in the end of days.

Hosea is clear when the Davidic king rules: after the exile of “many days” and after the Jewish return to G-d. The Jewish return to G-d brings the Messianic era (Isaiah 59:20, Deuteronomy 30:1-10). “Fear of the L-rd” suggests widespread knowledge of G-d.

Zechariah
9:9 Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion; shout, O daughter of Jerusalem: behold, your King comes to you: he is just, and redeemed; lowly, and riding upon an donkey, and upon a colt the foal of an donkey. 9:10 AndI will cut off the chariot from Ephraim, and the horse from Jerusalem, and the battle bow shall be cut off: and he shall speak peace unto the nations: and his dominion shall be from sea to sea, and from the river [even] to the ends of the earth

Zechariah 9 teaches us that King Messiah’s worldwide reign coincides with war ending and peace established.

Missionaries incorrectly credit Jesus with fulfilling Zechariah 9:9, because the New Testament says Jesus rode into a Jerusalem on a donkey. Besides being an extremely unimpressive achievement in ancient Jerusalem, Jesus’ ride failed to fulfill 9:10 which promises peace on earth.

Other passages referring to the Messiah as King and/or David are: Numbers 24, Isaiah 55, Jeremiah 23, Jeremiah 30, Ezekiel 34. Micah 4:8, Micah 5, Amos 9 and Daniel 7.

The Messiah as Tzemach (sprout):

Jeremiah 33:15 says, "In those days, and at that time, will I cause a righteous branch to sprout (tzemach) for David; and he shall do justice and righteousness inthe land."

Jeremiah above refers to the Messiah as a tzemach of David. This sets a precedent for calling the Messiah tzemach. The question is whether tzemach ever means the Messiah when David is not mentioned.

One instance where tzemach may refer to the Messiah is 4:2. "On that day, the sprout of the Lord shall be for beauty and for honor, and the fruit of the land for greatness and for glory for the survivors of Israel". This is not conclusive, however. Although this passage is about the Messianic era, in context tzemach may mean the flourishing of the Land of Israel.

Tzemach appears two times in Zechariah. Zechariah 3:6-8 reads, “G-d’s angel bore witness for Joshua, saying: ‘This is what the G-d of Hosts said: If you walk in My paths and keep My charge, then you will take charge of My house and guard My courtyard, and I will permit you to stroll among those standing [angels]. Listen, now, Joshua the High Priest- you and your companions who sit before you, for they are men worthy of a miracle. Behold I bring My servant Tzemach."

Joshua the High Priest served in the early days of the Second Temple. In this passage he is promised some sort of redemption. Tzemach can be either the Messiah or Zerubabel, the political leader of the Jews contemporary to Joshua. If Zerubabel, that man will rise in stature and succeed in his request to rebuild the Second Temple. If the Messiah, it means the events in the Messianic era will overshadow the partial deliverance represented by the Second Temple.

Reference to Tzemach is repeated in Zechariah 6:12-13: "And you shall speak to him saying, 'So says the L-rd of Hosts, saying: Behold a man whose name is Tzemach, and from his descendents will sprout the one who will buildthe Temple of the L-rd."

Here Tzemach is arguably not the Messiah, as Tzemach’s descendents, not himself, will build the Temple. The opinion that Tzemach is the Messiah would translate tachtav (literally: underneath him) as “his place” rather than “his descendents.”

Whether Tzemach is the Messiah or Zerubabel, there is no evidence for the view that the Messiah will die sacrificially during the Second Temple period. Also, Jesus did not “build G-d’s Temple (verse 13).”

In some instances the Messiah is called by an alternate title. In such cases, it makes sense to identify that person as the Messiah because his function, time and place are identical to the person called by the common Messianic titles.

Messiah called Redeemer

The word “redeemer” is certainly appropriate for the Messiah. The question is, what does the redeemer do, and when?

Isaiah 59:
17. And He donned righteousness like a coat of armor and a helmet of salvation is upon His head, and He donned garments of vengeance as His attire, and He was clad with zeal as a cloak.18. According to their deeds, He shall repay, fury to His adversaries, recompense to His enemies; to the islands He shall pay recompense.19. And from the west they shall fear the name of the L-rd, and from the rising of the sun, His glory, when distress shall come like a river; the spirit of the L-rd drives it away.20. And a redeemer shall come to Zion, to those who repent of transgression in Jacob, says the L-rd.21. "As for Me, this is My covenant with them," says the L-rd. "My spirit, which is upon you and My words that I have placed in your mouth, shall not depart from your mouth or from the mouth of your seed and from the mouth of your seed's seed," said the L-rd, "from now and to eternity."

The context is clear: the redeemer comes when G-d judges nations from east to west and rescues Israel. This did not happen at the time of Jesus. It will happen at the end of history.

Notice how the New Testament misquotes Isaiah: “The deliverer will come from Zion, he will turn godlessness away from Jacob. And this is my covenant with them when I take away their sin (Romans 11:26-27).”

The difference is profound. Isaiah says the redeemer comes to those who themselves turn away from transgression. As the Talmud says, “Great is repentance, for it brings redemption (Yoma 86b).’ The misquote in Romans “he will turn godlessness away from Jacob” creates the false impression that the Messiah comes to personally atone for Israel.

The covenant “My words that I have placed in your mouth” tells us that the Jews will forever study the Law of Moses. It is silly to suggest that G-d made a covenant that the Jews will eternally study the same Law that the New Testament declares "obsolete" (Hebrews 8:13). That is hardly a meaningful covenant. Clearly the Law is not obsolete.

Notice also that Romans deletes the real content of the covenant and replaces it with a Christian message: “when I take away their sin.” This is a blatant misquote of Isaiah 59:21.

The Messiah called by pronoun
The pronoun (He) may refer to the Messiah or G-d Himself (Isaiah 2:2-4, Micah 4:3). Either interpretation is acceptable, because (a) the Messiah is G-d’s instrument for transforming the world and (b) Scripture alternates between explicit references to G-d and to the Messiah as the one who ushers in the new world. These passage fits perfectly with other Messianic passages and certainly do not suggest a different role for the Messiah.

Isaiah 2:
2. And it shall be at the end of the days, the mountain of the L-rd'sHouse shall be firmly established at the top of the mountains, and it shall be raised above the hills, and all the nations shall stream to it.3. And many peoples shall go, and say, "Come, let us go up to the L-rd's mount, to the House of the G-d of Jacob, and let Him teach us of His ways, and we will go in His paths," for out of Zion shall the Torah come forth, and the word of the L-rd from Jerusalem. 4. And he [G-d or the Messiah] shall judge between the nations and reprove many peoples, and they shall beat their swords into plowshares and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift the sword against nation,neither shall they learn war anymore.

Isaiah 2 teaches the Temple will be rebuilt in an age of peace and universal knowledge of G-d.

Some Biblical books describe the Messianic era without referring to the Messiah (Deuteronomy 30, Zephaniah 3, Joel 3). The descriptions are totally consistent with passages that do reference the Messiah.

The Hebrew Bible gives us a clear and consistent view of the Messiah: what he does and when he does it. The Biblical passages indicate he will accomplish his mission at the end of history and in a short time. Since Jesus accomplished none of the Messiah’s tasks, missionaries must dogmatically insist that Jesus will do so when given a second chance. To this end they must revise the meaning and function of the Messiah to include what Jesus allegedly did already. The validity of this claim is assessed in part II of this essay.

Summary: Jesus is not eligible to be the Messiah because he is not descended paternally from David and Solomon and was not a reigning king. The Messiah comes at the end of history to reign during a rebuilt Temple, universal peace and knowledge of G-d, and ingathering of the Jewish exiles. He will accomplish his mission in a short time. Prophecies which are Messianic can be identified when describing an individual accomplishing such a mission. Jesus fulfilled no Messianic prophecies.